Showing posts with label The Lord of the Rings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Lord of the Rings. Show all posts

Monday, October 17, 2011

Fantasy Made Reality


I am a huge fan of “The Lord of the Rings” books and movies, so when I would see and hear of people who dress up as elves or hobbits and speak “Elvish,” I used to think that they were just hard-core fans. However Sociology taught me about sub-cultures and how some people really believe in these fantasy worlds and actually make it their reality.

Literature and Film are popular media cultures today. They both influence the creation of sub-cultures, such as “Witches and Wizards,” “Goths,” and “Vampires.” J.R.R Tolkien’s creation, however, of “The Lord of the Rings” transformed sub-culture and created a new fictional world, fully equipped with a dictionary, maps, languages, appendices, family trees, and histories of each people (elves, men, hobbits, etc.).




“The Lord of the Rings” sub-culture contains various aspects that people adapt into their lives. Whether it is on a daily basis or occasionally, these people enjoy dressing up in costume and partaking in Live Action Role Play, where they reenact scenes from the book or movie and actually take the time to learn “Elvish” to converse with each other.


People who form sub-cultures share common interests, values, symbols and material culture. Some examples of material culture within “The Lord of the Rings” include props from the movies, the books, as references to the dictionary, appendices and various scenes, and costumes. These material components symbolize what this sub-culture values. Being able to relate to other people in a fun, creative way is not only way of life, but also a means of escaping from reality.




Within “The Lord of the Rings” there are different cultures, languages and values. There is also an aspect of socialization within the books. The way in which different races of people interact with each other and the idea of diversity through intermarriage can potentially influence followers of the sub-culture to behave in a similar way.


Apart from fan-clubs, Live Action Role-playing and gatherings for the followers of "The Lord of the Rings" sub-culture, there are many websites that have been dedicated to J.R.R Tolkien and the books and movies. These websites have many activities, events, and forums for followers of J.R.R Tolkien's works. This shows how the Internet plays an active role as an agent of socialization in bringing sub-cultures together, where they can interact and express their views and beliefs quite openly.

“The Lord of the Rings” sub-culture is also viewed as a counter-culture, as it opposes and deviates from the norms of a larger culture. Many religions reject the idea of sub-cultures as it goes against their beliefs and values. The idea of magic, sorcery and a different world is firmly rejected by various religions, such as Christianity.

I like the idea and concept of a sub-culture, particularly because it’s what a group of people who share similar interests enjoy doing. Sub-cultures are very distinct. The ones that are based on fiction and fantasy are very interesting because many people wonder how a group of people can adapt to these imaginative worlds and actually make it a part of their reality.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Academy Awards - Highbrow Culture Awards?



The months of January and February are usually known as award season in Hollywood, due to the numerous film awards that take place. It starts off with certain critic awards such as the Broadcast Film Critics Association Awards or the Chicago Film Critics Association. Then perhaps the most acclaimed critics awards the Golden Globes, hosted by the Hollywood Foreign Press. These awards are decided upon by critics, who tend to fall under the lowbrow culture. These awards are followed by more presitigious awards such as the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) awards or Directors Guild of America followed by the most prestigious film awards The Academy Awards (The Oscars). These awards are voted by industry professionals such as very successful directors, actors, producers, in essence people into highbrow culture.

The winners of the various guild awards are usually great indications as to who will win the Oscars, since the members tend to overlap. Interestingly, the highbrow tastes of the members of the Academy is very evident by looking at the various Oscar winners. The year of 2009, Avatar was the most successful and critically acclaimed movie of the year. The movie won best picture in various critic awards such as New York Film Critics Online, the Critics Choice Award and The People's Choice Awards. However, it lost the Academy Awards to a much more highbrow film, The Hurt Locker, critics and people called it a huge upset. Avatar was a fantasy film revolving around aliens and magical creatures, not exactly highbrow culture, meanwhile The Hurt Locker, revolved around the struggle soldiers, mainly bomb defusers, face in Iraq, much more highbrow. In the past the last, and only, fantasy film to win the Best Picture Awards was The Lord of the Rings - Return of the King in 2003 and even that was sort of highbrow culture since it was adapted from a book.

Most recently, The Social Network , in my opinion best movie of the year, lost to The King's Speech, which was a very good movie however not as good as The Social Network, it was much


more suited for highbrow culture than the Social Network. The Social Network won most critic awards as well as the Golden Globes, during all of January and half of February it was the clear frontrunner. It was almost a sure thing. Then, the Guild Awards rolled in, with every guild award it seemed The King's Speech was gaining support and The Social Network was losing it. The Social Network wasn't Highbrow enough.

Therefore, once again highbrow culture seems to get more recognition then lowbrow with little regard to quality and more to taste.